Security and data requirements for a proposed district pilot.
RouteLedger currently provides a working demonstration on fictional sample data. Production security controls, district data access, AI features, and third-party integrations are proposed pilot requirements that must be separately scoped, reviewed, and verified before implementation.
Proposed pilot security requirements
- Encryption requirements. A district pilot would need documented encryption controls for any approved district data in transit and at rest, verified during the district's security review.
- Access-control requirements. Any production user roles and least-privilege permissions would be defined and validated for the district's actual pilot scope.
- Audit-record requirements. The pilot scope should identify the actions, approvals, exceptions, and retention periods that the district requires to be recorded.
- Data-minimization requirements. The district determines which route, rate, and service fields are necessary and whether any sensitive fields must be excluded.
No third-party security certification is held or claimed. The controls above are proposed requirements, not independently verified production implementations. District security staff determine the evidence required before any district data is processed.
Sample-workspace and proposed AI boundaries
The verified sample workspace demonstrates invoice matching and staff-reviewed sample credit actions using fictional data. A production AI extraction, matching, explanation, or model-training implementation has not been independently verified and is not represented as deployed.
If any AI assistance is proposed for a district pilot, its provider, permitted data, retention, model use, review process, and audit requirements must be separately documented and approved. District staff must retain authority over every real payment and credit.
Proposed data ownership, export, and deletion terms
A district pilot should define data ownership, approved uses, export formats, retention periods, and deletion requirements before any real records are accepted. Those terms and their implementation require district approval and independent verification; no existing production data arrangement is claimed.
Reliability requirements to scope
Any production file exchange, monitoring, alerting, incident response, reconciliation status, and service expectations must be defined for the district's proposed pilot. No live district pipeline, response guarantee, or production monitoring implementation is represented.
District purchasing and security review
Before a district pilot is approved, discuss the requirements your purchasing and security teams actually identify:
- The proposed fixed-price pilot scope and actual sample demonstration
- The district's own purchasing, approval, and documentation process
- Required data-handling, access-control, and security-review evidence
- Potential file mappings and any separately approved implementation work
About the company
RouteLedger is published by JS Technology Solutions, Inc. Company website: www.jstech-inc.com. For questions about the sample workspace or proposed pilot, write to hello@getrouteledger.com.